We had an hourlong conversation with U.S. Rep. John Barrow, Democrat, of Georgia’s 12th District. I was on speakerphone, but Rep. Barrow was in his Savannah office with Janet, Danny and Christian, who had Shannon on speakerphone.
It was a good conversation, and he offered us specifics and reasons for his views. I don’t think any of us agreed with everything he said, but I was impressed with how thoughtful his answers were.
He’s talking about a public-private partnership that would put more regulation on insurance companies and still allow consumer choice. There’s elements of the Massachusetts plan, where people are mandated to buy insurance, but it’s on a sliding-scale fee and people who can’t get insurance would be covered by a government-funded plan.
This would get people access to health care before illness becomes serious and a lot more expensive to treat. Someone with diabetes would have access to the supplies needed to control blood sugar and avert complications. As it is now, someone with diabetes who can’t get those supplies winds up in the emergency room five ot 10 years down the road with complications like kidney failure or infections that require costly, lengthy treatment or amputation.
Somebody with high blood pressure who can’t afford medication will cost a whole lot more if he or she has a stroke.
Asthma that’s managed properly doesn’t require nearly as much hospital treatment.
People whose bronchitis develops into pneumonia cost a lot more than people who can get antibiotic treatment early on.
In other words, it costs us a whole lot more NOT to treat people.
So, even if you don’t want to look at the problem from a humanistic point of view, consider the money we’re pouring into the system now. It’s our money, too. Yours and mine.
Mike would have had access to a colonoscopy under a plan like this, and he’d probably still be alive. Not to mention how much less money would have been spent to treat him.
Janet would be able to buy insurance from a group plan for freelance artists, which can’t be done now. So, if she gets sick, she’ll wait until she’s really, really sick before going to a doctor.
I would have a choice between my current insurance or a government plan, which I would pay for just as I do my current plan, and the private insurers wouldn’t be the only game in town.
Under current law — or lack of it, really — insurance companies can change the rules at will. They can decide to stop covering a certain treatment, declare something “experimental,” claim that the doctors’ charges are “unreasonable” and cover only a fraction of the cost of a procedure. Even people with insurance are left deep in debt.
What really impressed me about the whole conversation was that Danny — who’s very conservative — and I –the liberal — both went away agreeing with much of what he said.
He agrees that it’s time to stop hollering at each other — this person wants a single-payer system and isn’t willing to budge and that person thinks the government shouldn’t have anything to do with health care — and come to an agreement that will get America’s 45 million uninsured, and tens of millions more underinsured Americans, access to our health care system.
There are ways to do it. We’re the only industrialized nation in the world that doesn’t do it. It’s time.
Post a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.